COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF R' COMPOUND,
AN INDEGENOUS
FORMULATION AND ASPIRIN IN THE
TREATMENT OF POLY ARTICULAR RHEUMATOID
ARTHRITIS ON 104 PATIENTS
AN OPEN STUDY.
Dr
R.S Kulkarni, M.B.B.S., Ortho. , M.S (Bom) F.C.P.S (Ortho)
Medical Supdt., Govt Rural Hospital, Kudal : 416 520, Dist Sindhudurg
INTRODUCTION
Rheumatoid
arthritis is a crippling disease; with no satisfactory remedy till today and
has been known since the times of Hippocrates. The disease has been mentioned
in Ayurveda and has been described by Charak, Sushrut1. It is a
common disorder related to varied multiple anatomical sites, both articular
and extra articular2.
Although number of anti-inflammatory drugs are in use unfortunately not
a single fits in - from the point of view of efficacy as
well as tolerance. Hence the disease continues to be a challenge to the
Orthopedic Surgeons. So, there is need for a drug having good efficacy with
low toxic profile for prolonged use in preventing exacerbations and remissions.
In Ayurveda, large number of herbal drugs having similar therapeutic
actions are in clinical use since centuries for the treatment of rheumatoid
arthritis and have stood the test of time, especially for long term use - One such product is - R. Compound, prepared
on the basis of Indian medicinal system of Ayurveda.
AIM OF STUDY
Theindigenous drug - R.Compound mainly to be used for a pretty long time in a chronic
crippling disease like Poly articular rheumatoid arthritis, as compared to good
old timehonored drug - Aspirin. The trial was designed to test
anti-inflammatory, analgesicand over all effects including the side effects of
an ayurvedic drug - R. COMPOUND and ASPIRIN. And much more so to know their effect
on remissions and exacerbations.
R. COMPOUND
R. Compound is an indigenous drug manufactured by M/s Alarsin
Pharmaceuticals, Bombay containing the following ingredients.
I.
Mahayograj Guggul with gold bhasma - 200 mg. Its chief ingredient is Guggul Balsamodendron Mukul.) It is an oleoresin containing volatile oil, gum resin with a bitter principle.It is prepared from thirty herbo mineral drugs. It has broad spectrum properties - mainly analgesic and anti-inflammatory alongwith that demulscent, carminative, laxative, anti-spasmodic, anti-suppurative, hematinic mode of action.
II.
MaharasnadiQuath - 67 mgs.
It is prepared from twenty five different herbal drugs. Its chief ingredient is Rasna.
It has anti-inflammatory, analgesic, diuretic, detoxicating properties.
III.
Gold Bhasma.
Gold is reduced to ash form by special ayurvedic processes. It is non-toxic and non- cumulative. It builds up body resistance. It is also considered as a metabolic stimulant and activates reticulo endothelial system. It acts as a metabolic catalyst and brings about sense of wellbeing. It also acts as an antiseptic.
IV.
Curcuma longa.
The above three ingredients are processed in Haldi (Curcuma-longa) - which also has got anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial effect. It has also beneficial action
over platelet aggregation and vascular prostaglandin synthesis. The activation of adreno hypophyseal axis may be responsible for
inhibition of degenerative changes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The clinical trial was
conducted at Govt. Rural
hospital Deogad over a period from 1987
to 1989.
Patients were selected from OPD
during the
above said three years
duration. Total no.of
patients are 104. The inclusion criteria were morning
stiffness, reduced painful movements. Patients having diabetes mellitus,
hypertension, renal diseases chronic peptic ulcer, drug therapy with SAARDS
and NSAIDs, pregnant women were excluded from the study.
PLAN OF STUDY
Two qroups were made serially - odd numbers for R. Compound and even
numbers for Aspirin drug. Each patient was given two tablets (Aspirin) or R.
Compound) three times a day after food for a period of six weeks.
The diagnosis and grading of Polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis was based on
the ARA criteria.
|
R. Compound |
Aspirin |
Classical |
51.0% |
45.0% |
Definite |
44.7% |
49.0% |
Probable |
4.3% |
6.0% |
|
TABLE-11 |
|
|
Sex |
|
|
R. Compound |
Aspirin |
Males |
35.3% |
31.9% |
Females |
64.7% |
68.1% |
|
|
|
|
TABLE-lll Age |
|
|
R. Compound |
Aspirin |
Average |
45.8 yrs. |
39.5 yrs. |
Range |
(17-79) yrs. |
(10-65) yrs. |
|
TABLE-IV |
|
Duration
of acute attack (In weeks) |
||
|
R. Compound |
Aspirin |
Average |
5.59 |
3.38 |
Range |
(1-52) |
(0-26) |
Std.
Deviation |
9.22 |
5.4 |
|
FT
Compound |
Aspirin |
Average Range Std. Deviation |
206.76 (0-4800) 688.33 |
89.36 (1-624) 113.1 |
|
TABLE-VI |
|
Type of Personality |
|
|
|
R.
Compound |
Aspirin |
Anxious |
35.3% |
44.7% |
Depressive |
2.0% |
2.0% |
Other |
62.7% |
51.3% |
|
TABLE-VII |
|
No. of joints involved |
|
|
|
R.
Compound |
Aspirin |
Average |
3.8 |
4.02 |
Range |
(1-8) |
(1-10) |
Std, Deviation |
1.8 |
2.35 |
|
|
|
TABLE VIII |
||
|
R.
Compound |
Aspirin |
Yes |
84.3% |
89.10% |
No |
15.7% |
10.6% |
ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS
Once the drugs
were started, all the patients were evaluated weekly for the first six weeks,
then once in fifteen days (once the drugs were stopped) for a period of four
months. There after once in a month. The printed post cards used to be posted
on the addresses of the patients on fixed dates for regular follow up to
prevent the dropout rate to minimum.
Maximum follow
up period in this study was 29 months and the minimum follow up period was 8
months.
The
patients were examined on weekly basis in beginning - subjectively and objectively,
using clinical parameters like morning stiffness, pain at rest, pain on
movement, tenderness, ESR, joint circumferences and measuring movements of
joints, grip strength RA factor. Radiological examination was performed at the
beginning and at the last follow up.
|
|
R Compound |
Aspirin |
Peripheral smear
done for hypochromic microcytic anaemia |
Yes |
70.6% |
80.9% |
No |
29.4% |
19.1% |
|
ESR |
Average Range |
63.6 mm/hr |
61.0 mm/hr |
|
+ve |
21.6% |
23.4% |
-ve |
78.4 |
76.6% |
|
X-ray findings |
|
|
|
Osteoporosis |
|
2.9 |
3.1 |
Periarticular
swelling |
|
2.0 |
2.4 |
Joint Intervals |
|
2.3 |
2.2 |
Increased Density |
|
0.02 |
0.02 |
Irregularity of
articular surface |
|
0.73 |
0.62 |
Marginal Spurring |
|
1.65 |
2.7 |
SIDE EFFECTS
It was recorded with every patient at each visit.
Four patients were dropped from the study (Aspirin group) due to severe GIT disturbances.
TOXICITY PROFILE
|
R.Compound |
Aspirin |
Drop out rate (due to severe toxic effects of drugs) |
0 |
4 |
GIT Symptoms, pain in abdomen vomiting, retrosternal burning sensation |
0 |
36 |
Antacid therapy started |
0 |
36 |
Analysis
was restricted to patients who completed the study. The data obtained was
processed on a computer. Differences between the groups are compared by
Wilcoxon and student's test't'. Data are expressed are as Mean ± SD.
RESULTS:
Comparative Efficacy of R. Compound & Aspirin: (n — 100)
Subject
Criteria.
|
R Compound |
Aspirin |
Morning
StiffnessBeginning |
31.07
± 9.91 |
34.12 ±13.15" |
End |
00.58
± 2.57 |
1.25 ± 2.82 |
|
3.96 ± 0.19 |
4.00 ± 0.00 |
End |
0.03 ± 0.19 |
0.12 ± 0.39 |
Pain
on movement Beginning |
3.86 ± 0.40 |
4.00 ± 0.00 |
End |
0.07 ± 0.27 |
0.10 ± 0.30 |
Tenderness Beginning |
3.84 ±
0.61 |
4.00 ± 0.00 |
End |
0.03
± 0.19 |
0.02 ± 0.14 |
|
|
OBJECTIVE
CRITERIA |
|
R.Compound |
Aspirin |
|
1 |
Joint Circumference |
Knee |
Beginning |
Rt |
16.71 ± 0.82 |
16.58 ± 0.76 |
|
|
Lt |
16.79 ± 1.48 |
16.85 ± 0.94 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
14.33 ± 2.48 |
15.25 ± 0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt |
14.79 ± 0.80 |
15.26 ± 0.80 |
|
|
Wrist |
Beginning |
Rt |
8.52 ± 1.23 |
8.34 ± 0.64 |
|
|
Lt |
8.68 ± 0.88 |
8.53 ± 0.38 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
7.28 ± 0.96 |
7.23 ± 0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt |
7.23 ± 0.93 |
7.15 ± 0.50 |
|
|
Elbow |
Beginning |
Rt |
12.38 ± 1.38 |
12.44 ± 0.79 |
|
|
Lt |
12.38 ± 0.65 |
12.23 ± 0.75 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
9.88 ± 3.06 |
10.52 ± 0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt |
10.01 ± 2.09 |
10.50 ± 0.66 |
|
|
Ankle |
Beginning |
Rt |
11.32 ± 0.46 |
11.34 ± 0.74 |
|
|
Lt |
0.00 ± 0.00 |
0.00 ± 0.00 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
9.82 ± 0.63 |
10.52 ± 0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt |
9.82 ± 0.63 |
10.00 ± 0.54 |
2 |
Movements |
Knee |
Beginning |
Rt |
87.43 ± 8.49 |
86.66 ± 7.92 |
|
|
Lt |
86.40 ± 7.09 |
88.38 ± 5.73 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
114.87 ± 10.22 |
113.47 ± 8.92 |
|
|
|
Lt |
115.56 ± 8.37 |
114.35 ± 9.24 |
||
|
|
Wrist DF |
Beginning |
Rt |
32.50 ± 9.57 |
25.00 ± 10.00 |
|
|
Lt |
31.25 ± 8.53 |
16.66 ± 5.77 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
56.25 ± 7.50 |
40.00 ± 8.16 |
|
|
|
Lt |
55.00 ± 5.77 |
36.66 ± 5.77 |
||
|
|
Wrist PF |
Beginning |
Rt |
28.00 ± 8.36 |
21.66 ± 7.63 |
|
|
Lt |
30.00 ± 7.90 |
17.50 ± 3.53 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
50.00 ± 12.24 |
40.00 ± 10.00 |
|
|
|
Lt |
50.00 ± 12.24 |
37.50 ± 3.53 |
||
|
|
Elbow |
Beginning |
Rt |
94.44 ± 8.47 |
94.21 ± 6.92 |
|
|
Lt |
95.18 ± 6.42 |
93.15 ± 7.49 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
123.51± 11.58 |
121.05 ± 6.57 |
|
|
|
Lt |
125.74 ± 9.87 |
121.57 ± 6.02 |
||
|
|
Ankle DF |
Beginning |
Rt |
10.00 ± 0.00 |
10.00 ± 0.00 |
|
|
Lt |
10.62 ± 2.50 |
11.17 ± 2.18 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
15.35 ± 2.37 |
15.93 ± 2.71 |
|
|
|
Lt |
15.62 ± 1.70 |
15.29 ± 1.21 |
||
|
|
Ankle PF |
Beginning |
Rt |
21.33 ± 6.11 |
23.52 ± 4.92 |
|
|
Lt |
22.35 ± 6.15 |
23.88 ± 5.01 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
40.66 ± 8.83 |
39.11 ± 6.66 |
|
|
|
Lt |
41.17 ± 9.44 |
40.27 ± 7.37 |
||
|
|
PIP |
Beginning |
Rt |
77.77 ± 6.66 |
76.92 ± 4.80 |
|
|
Lt |
76.11 ± 4.85 |
76.53 ± 6.25 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
89.44 ± 5.27 |
89.23 ± 2.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt |
88.33 ± 3.53 |
90.00 ± 0.00 |
3 |
Grip Strength |
|
Beginning |
Rt |
93.33 ± 5.00 |
89.23 ± 6.40 |
|
|
Lt |
97.50 ± 10.35 |
90.76 ± 6.40 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
125.55 ± 11.30 |
120.76 ± 10.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt |
127.50 ± 13.88 |
120.76 ± 8.62 |
4 |
Grasp |
|
Beginning |
Rt |
2.11 ± 0.33 |
1.61 ± 0.50 |
|
|
Lt |
1.50 ± 0.53 |
1.76 ± 0.72 |
||
|
|
End |
Rt |
3.66 ± 0.50 |
3.38 ± 0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lt |
3.87 ± 0.35 |
3.46 ± 0.51 |
5 |
ESR |
|
Beginning |
|
62.01 ± 24.89 |
64.91 ± 23.77 |
|
|
|
End |
|
15.50 ± 9.18 |
22.27 ± 11.92 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Final Assessment |
Good |
92.20% |
17.08% |
||
|
|
Satisfactory |
7.80% |
80.09% |
||
|
|
|
Slight |
|
0 |
2.10% |